Green Noise
Well, I have just about had it with “Green”. Why? Too much hype. Everyone on the planet is running around explaining why their products are “green”, including Pillar.
So if you are buying storage, who should you believe? What’s real, and what is just a load of crap?
Here are a few observations regarding all the Green Noise out there regarding storage systems:
1. If you want to save power, use the capacity you own. Don’t allow 60% of it to sit there spoken for, but not used (Thin Provisioning) along with technology that allows performance expectations to be met when the disk is full…
2. If your storage system performance falls apart as you fill the disk – consider Pillar Axiom – it is designed to give great performance when it is highly utilized, even as high as 85%.
3. If you can use SATA 7200 RPM disk for an application instead of FC, use it, it is roughly half the power of FC 15K RPM disk.
4. If you can use de-duplication to keep from wasting a lot of space, use it.
5. If you can use 1TB disk for applications versus 500GB or 750GB, use it. The higher the capacity the better in terms of Watts/GB. Use the biggest drives you can, unless you need spindles for IOPS and cannot afford the higher capacity models.
6. If you need some small databases with relatively high IO requirements, consider sharing the spindles from a disk-to-disk backup solution, a VTL solution, or any other giving high priority to the database. Pillar’s QoS will allow you to parcel out IO’s from all those spindles you own to applications that need the IO but not the capacity, and Thinly provision the capacity to the applications that are data hogs. Array sharing is green, and without the drawbacks one normally encounters with non Application Aware systems.
7. Turn the lights off when you aren’t in the room.
8. Let Boise-Cascade plant trees, your storage company is probably not the best way to reforest the planet.
People seem to want to say anything to claim they are green. I commit that we will use our engineers, and efforts to work on this problem. Buying carbon credits is a nice gesture, but for god sake it is not the best way to tackle this problem.
North America

Points #1, 3, 4 and 5: Does Pillar provide services to help its customers better manage their storage systems?
Points #8: Plant a tree does not cost that much. There should be at least a tree per department at Pillar's campus planted to show that Pillar is committed to green for the environment and business world.
Posted by: cuong nguyen | June 09, 2008 at 09:38 AM
I agree with point 8 - How about if Pillar Data continues to focus on improvements to my storage arrays and let the trees get planted by others.
I serve on an environmental commission and we like the "green" initiatives like power savings coming from companies like Pillar. Keep up the good work and let the other experts plant trees for you. (Pillar can sponsor them if they want).
Posted by: Jacqueline Hoffsten | June 24, 2008 at 08:11 AM
Cuong,
Sure, Pillar provides product functions and professional services to help people manage their storage systems.
On the Planting Trees suggestion you make: Cuong, I love trees and appreciate that you think this is a nice gesture. I also believe it is symbolic and not material. I do believe that Employing 200+ engineers who are building a system that allows IT operations to drastically increase their storage utilization is far more material, and far more than symbolic; it is powerful in the "green war".
I choose to put Pillar's resources to work on projects that will eclipse mere symbolic gestures.
To me, it is the only choice.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Workman | June 25, 2008 at 12:36 PM